Deriving Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients | Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @wernerheisenberg7192
    @wernerheisenberg7192 4 года назад +7

    Thx! Perfect timing! Writing a quantum mechanics exam on Wednesday :)

    • @PrettyMuchPhysics
      @PrettyMuchPhysics  4 года назад +3

      That‘s awesome, good luck!

    • @wernerheisenberg7192
      @wernerheisenberg7192 3 года назад +1

      @@PrettyMuchPhysics haha thanks, mate! I got the result today and it‘s a 1.0 which is the highest grade here in Germany. I actually didn‘t need the CG-coefficients in the exam but your video helped me to be prepared when there would have been an exercise about this (we derived it for Spin-1/2 in homework). Thus you gave me confidence! Thank you! Keep your work up!

    • @PrettyMuchPhysics
      @PrettyMuchPhysics  3 года назад

      That‘s great, congratulations! 🎉

  • @ICatPatrol
    @ICatPatrol 4 года назад +9

    Really easy to follow, amazing work from you all as always!

  • @ParthGChannel
    @ParthGChannel 4 года назад +7

    Wonderfully explained, guys!

  • @ΘεόδωροςΜπίκος-υ1ο
    @ΘεόδωροςΜπίκος-υ1ο 4 года назад +4

    this came up by the time i started Atomic physics! thank you so much!

  • @jonathan3372
    @jonathan3372 3 месяца назад

    I have some questions about the tensor product:
    (1) At 3:50, why is the middle term 2*(j_1 ⋅ j_2) instead of 2*(j_1 ⊗ j_2)? (I confess I am a bit lost on which of the operators on that page are vectors, scalars, or tensors :/ )
    (2) A more general question, is ⊗ commutative for states in Hilbert spaces, e.g. is |state 1〉 ⊗ |state 2〉 the same as |state 2〉 ⊗ |state 1〉?

  • @meetghelani5222
    @meetghelani5222 Месяц назад

    ayo, mah man, great explanation but where's the reduced planck's constant @3:27 ?

  • @giannakos4081
    @giannakos4081 Год назад

    Amazing video! Thank you very much!

  • @mohammadarshadpathan490
    @mohammadarshadpathan490 8 месяцев назад +1

    In general for n particles of spin s How many entries of the matrix will be zero?

  • @asifzaman3503
    @asifzaman3503 3 года назад +3

    Sir, which software do you use for writing?

    • @PrettyMuchPhysics
      @PrettyMuchPhysics  3 года назад +1

      It’s an iPad app called „Explain Everything“!

  • @marcossilvadepaula7753
    @marcossilvadepaula7753 2 года назад

    Thank you!

  • @gerontius1726
    @gerontius1726 4 года назад +2

    Afraid I don't recognize the symbol you have used @ 3:40

    • @PrettyMuchPhysics
      @PrettyMuchPhysics  4 года назад +7

      This is a tensor product: ⊗
      You could write for example
      j_1z |j1 m1 j2 m2>
      but to make it clear what's happening, you can use the tensor product:
      j_1z ⊗ 1_2 |j1 m1 j2 m2> = j_1z ⊗ 1_2 |j1 m1> ⊗ |j2 m2> = ( j_1z |j1 m1> ) ⊗ ( 1_2 |j2 m2> ) = ( m1 |j1 m1> ) ⊗ ( |j2 m2> ) = m1 |j1 m1 j2 m2>

  • @priteshsrivastava5850
    @priteshsrivastava5850 3 года назад +1

    at 4:33, why gamma 1 = gamma 2 ? can anyone explain>?

    • @priteshsrivastava5850
      @priteshsrivastava5850 3 года назад +1

      is it because [10> is an eigenstate of J^2?

    • @PrettyMuchPhysics
      @PrettyMuchPhysics  3 года назад +3

      @@priteshsrivastava5850 Good question! If you compare coefficients, then you get two equations:
      (1) g2 + g3 = 2 g2
      (2) g2 + g3 = 2 g3
      The solution to this set of equations is g2 = g3.